To follow more of our ramblings and get the insider track on what's going on,
follow us on Twitter: @49thfloor or on Facebook.com/49thfloor

Steve Jobs - Let's get some perspective shall we

Rate this item
(5 votes)

On 31 August 1997 Diana, Princess of Wales died in a car accident in Paris. There was an immediate and overwhelming outpouring of public emotion, people were crying in the streets and were generally devastated at the loss of 'The People's Princess'. Contrary to the norm and despite my genuine respect for Diana as a person who seemingly worked really hard in the name of various good causes - when I learned this news I soon found myself getting angry. I was angry not as you might expect at the loss of an admittedly iconic and presumably 'nice' lady with 'a heart of gold' but at the fact that for at least the next 3 days that's all that was on TV, the radio and in news/conversation around the world and it got really boring really fast.

 

I don't want to suggest that I am some sort of heartless ogre who is addicted to TV and spikes into incandescent rage when I don't get my GMTV or Eastenders fix, but the fact is I did not know this woman. If I had died under the same circumstances would she have shed a tear for me? Clearly not. This not because she was a callous bitch either - just because she doesn't know anything about me and that's the reality. You could argue that through her good work and duties she touched many lives and these were the people that were expressing their emotions - and I get this, but I would argue that in truth these people were in the significant minority and the rest just jumped on the band-wagon and formed a gang of faux-maudlin rioters spreading their grief through the streets like a fire.

 

It's sad when someone dies and death should be respected and reflected upon by the family members and friends who knew the individual on a personal level, and with a nod or passing glance by those who did not but were affected by their lives. Often in the case of celebrities death breeds superlatives beyond reason. This angers me - especially if I can't watch telly due to yet another discussion about an exceptional life (forget any negative traits or controversy for now, because y'know she's dead n tha'). In human context was she anything more than a nice but dim, rich woman who married into celebrity and chose to use this celebrity to aid good causes? Maybe she was, but I don't know that because I didn't know her and I refused to pretend that I did.

Thursday 6th October 2011, today in fact, it is announced that Steve Jobs ex-CEO of Apple has sadly died and after an hour or two Twitter and Facebook are starting to remind me of Princess Diana's death and the outpouring of emotion by people who cannot separate their own lives from those of someone they feel they should mourn because everyone else is. I am a big Apple fan as I have stated on here many times and I enjoy their technical innovations, products and general approach. I am aware that Steve Jobs was a driving force behind many of these innovations and deserves our respect as a highly creative and ultimately very successful business man. The iMac, iPod, iPhone, iPad and whatnot have all added to the rich technological tapestry that form our existence here in the 21st century and other distinct innovations in the past have fundamentally changed the scape of the market 49th floor operate in. The big thing is that companies are more than one man and this is particularly the case with a global behemoth such as Apple, even 49th Floor has 2 utterly separate individuals at it's core. Steve Jobs might have been the man standing at the front delivering exceptional keynote speeches and he might have been the man that had a say in the companies success on a major scale, but is he alone responsible for the flagship developments of recent times that the general public appear to hold so dear?

Let me break this wide open - no. He might have attended the meeting, approved the financing or established the development schedule, but the fact is that Apple on the whole produced those products by working together and engaging with the keen skill of a multitude of people. It's the combined application of the organisation on the whole that I respect not a lucky fellow who made talented friends and rode his gravy train as far as it would take him flying the flag for everyone beneath him. I'm sure he worked damn hard - but who doesn't, especially in big commercial companies. To those that have written something along the lines of "We'll miss you Steve' I would like to ask this; why? Did you know him? Did you speak to him? Share a beer? Talk about the game? Do you have such little respect for Apple on the whole that you think that his unfortunate and early demise will change ANYTHING about how that company operates? You may as well say you're going to miss Tom Johnstone, CEO of SKF when he dies. SKF make ball-bearings and they impact all of our lives to a huge extent. He is a successful business man working hard to ensure his company remains at the top of the tree, but you don't care about him because he hasn't manufactured himself into a palatable package ready for media consumption.

People have started saying things like 'he changed my life' but really they mean 'insert iProduct X changed my life' and even then is that really true? Where would we be without the incredibly expensive techno-junk that they have created? In exactly the same place doing exactly the same thing with equipment that is virtually the same. Let me put this into perspective;

Language
Antibiotics
Anaesthetic
Printing Press
Birth Control
Light bulb
Telephone
The Internet
iPod - it's OK, we have CD players, Walkman, MiniDisc players and a million different MP3 Players
iPhone - dry your eyes, go and grab yourself a Motorolla or Samsung
iPad - buy a paper or read a book
iMac - get another computer - there's a bagillion and there'll ALL be cheaper

I DO think that Apple products are great but they aren't Earth shattering ones on their own - but are expensive developments or re-designs of established concepts and saying they define your life is just plain stupid.

Steve Jobs has died early and that is sad, but please don't remember him like he was a God - he was a very, very rich and successful business man and to get to own that crown he also need a ruthless streak which might well tarnish some of those po-faced quotes that are being splattered all over the place as I speak. He was a master of marketing and this is best observed in the public perception of the man himself who managed to carve out the visage of a charismatic innovator and approachable boss beyond that of a cut-throat business mastermind. By all means mourn Steve Jobs if you knew him or if you feel he touched your life, but do so privately and bare in mind that I expect you to write quips and quotes when the following people die:

Mohamed Al Fayed
Ken Bates
Mark Thompson
Sir Clive Sinclair
Allan Sugar
Bill Gates
Mark Zuckerberg
Tony Blair

Last modified on Friday, 07 October 2011 08:59
David Smith

David Smith

Andy and I make up 49th Floor Design and Artworking. yeah, yeah this is great, but more importantly; I own the Mysterious Cities of Gold and Quincy DVD box sets.

Website: www.facebook.com/49thfloor

5 comments

  • Comment Link Andy Swain Wednesday, 23 November 2011 12:07 posted by Andy Swain

    "Leonardo Da Vinci at the time was just a talented Painter & Decorator who had a pastime for crazy inventions..."

    If your tongue wasn't firmly in your cheek while you typed this then you are either very, very stupid or a cardinal of the good old Catholic Church. You've totally missed half the point of the article by drawing any comparison between Jobs and Leonardo.

  • Comment Link Tobi JEnkins Saturday, 08 October 2011 13:36 posted by Tobi JEnkins

    I think Apple have certainly changed the way we think, communicate & interact with each other. Arguably more so than any other tech company, certainly in the last 10 years. So I think we should give the man his dues.

    However, Steve Jobs' death has coincided with Apple being 'on trend' currently and the media always commentate on current 'on trend' affairs. So they know people will watch/read if they cover these stories. Its all about air time/readership figures.

    I guess many people saw Steve Jobs and Apple as the same thing, the same person if you like and are maybe mourning the loss of both man and more so, his vision? Your're right in the fact that many other people contribute to apples success, Jonathan Ive on the iPhone etc. Hopefully Apple will continue to grow after Steve Jobs' death.

  • Comment Link Andy H Friday, 07 October 2011 10:17 posted by Andy H

    Fair comments Graham and thanks for responding. Steve Jobs was certainly a massively talented business man but I think he may have to go some to be mentioned in the same breath as Da Vinci in 400 years time.

    Leonardo is recognized as a genius today because his ideas were hundreds of years ahead of their time. The equivalent would be the discovery of a Steve Jobs notebook that includes a sketch for a working flux capacitor and then going on to find an operational Stargate in his garage.

    Despite being a long time Mac user, I have always been reviled by the sycophantic nature of many of Apple’s fans. In the main, it will be these people who display their ill judged outpouring of their perceived loss. Should we offer them sympathy for their own personal (non-existant) tragedy or simply remember that this was a guy with a wife and kids and offer sympathy where it is truly due?

    Bottom line is, Jobs was an interesting man who ran a company that produces the best laptops, phones and operating systems. Unfortunately, even if the Flux Capacitor thing is proved true I’m still giving it to Robert Zemeckis.

  • Comment Link Raul Maximillian Friday, 07 October 2011 09:41 posted by Raul Maximillian

    Jesus was just a carpenter turned zombie born from a ghost shagging a prostitute. Lots of historically dubious revelations here this morning.

  • Comment Link Graham Friday, 07 October 2011 09:14 posted by Graham

    I agree – i think the difference is that he was an icon in our industry. Look around – go to the paper shop – nobody is chatting about it.

    What differs here is that whilst the people he employed for sure did the work, it was his CEO vision, leadership, foundation of the company and his firm philosophies which led Apple to such riches. There are many great people working for other businesses, none of whom produce such iconic products though as it's the CEO who controls the ship.

    He was a man who cared about design, and whilst the iPhone in principle wasn't new, nor was the PC, nor was an all-in-one computer – his products sit in world museums as game-changers as icons of design. He was an artist in the world of business. History glorifies over time – Leonardo Da Vinci at the time was just a talented Painter & Decorator who had a pastime for crazy inventions...

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

Scroll To Top